[YouTube] You are Hiring a Person Not a Subcontinent: A Basic Error in The Interpretation of Statistics.

Outlining a basic error in statistical interpretation: statistics works on aggregates, not individual instances. You can only use statistical properties when dealing with groups not individuals –except when the variance is zero –in which case why use statistics?
Even if IQ worked outside of severe deficits, it wouldn’t be applicable to decisions concerning single individuals.
Applies to President Biden’s pancreatic cancer.
I use as example on IQ arguments by bullshit vendor Geoffrey Miller.

[Substack] Have Another Drink!

I have been finding flaws in studies critical of alcohol consumption in low to moderate doses. The one I will examine is the following one used as “definitive” argument in the medical discussions.

George S, Naimi TS, Keyes K, Martinez-Matyszczyk P, et al. (including Shield KD). “Alcohol Intake and Health Study: No Protective Effect at Low Levels, With Mortality Increasing to 1 in 25 at 14 Drinks Per Week.” Journal of Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 2026 (Vol. 87, Issue 4; DOI: 10.15288/jsad.25-00435). This analysis was commissioned by the US goverment. It has a deceiving title and a deceiving summary conclusion: “At low levels of consumption, no protective net effect of alcohol consumption on health was observed.”. Their claim is that lifetime alcohol-attributable mortality risk were >1 in 1,000 at around 7 drinks per week and reached ~1 in 25 (4%) at 14 drinks/week (the established upper guideline limit). It offers a guidance of no more than 1 drink per day (or less).

Continue reading on Substack – nntaleb.substack.com/p/have-another-drink