
Link to Post on X – https://x.com/nntaleb/status/1904526070193275295
We’ll update this post with the Zoom link as soon as it’s available.
.org (UNOFFICIAL news site)

Link to Post on X – https://x.com/nntaleb/status/1904526070193275295
We’ll update this post with the Zoom link as soon as it’s available.

Link to post – x.com/nntaleb/status/1892340170109653096


The foreword accompanies the following textbooks:
Writing the foreword to a textbook on Antifragility by @mathoncbro et al: ANTIFRAGILITY is not a rediscovery of hormesis, but a mathematical framework uniting classes of phenomena and, centrally, transferring from the dose-response to the probabilistic domains.
Link to Paper – Half of a Coin: Negative Probabilities
Link to paper – papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4965616

Statistical and applied probabilistic knowledge is the core of knowledge; statistics is what tells you if something is true, false, or merely anecdotal; it is the “logic of science”; it is the instrument of risk-taking; it is the applied tools of epistemology; you can’t be a modern intellectual and not think probabilistically—but… let’s not be suckers. The problem is much more complicated than it seems to the casual, mechanistic user who picked it up in graduate school. Statistics can fool you. In fact it is fooling your government right now. It can even bankrupt the system (let’s face it: use of probabilistic methods for the estimation of risks did just blow up the banking system).
Link to essay – www.edge.org/conversation/the-fourth-quadrant-a-map-of-the-limits-of-statistics