Thanks to QuantLabs.net for the link.
Author: Stephany Aulenback
Poker and Antifragility
For the Poker Asia Pacific website, Australian poker player Daniel Laidlaw discusses Nassim’s books and how they reframed his thinking about poker.
Nassim’s Mistake About Power Laws
On twitter, Nassim refers to a “mistake” he made “about power laws with ‘near-infinite’ but not infinite support.” He explains in this document:
Genealogy of the Black Swan Problem
Image from fooledbyrandomness.
Formalization of the Barbell
Nassim and Paul Wilmott Offer 2-Day Seminar in London, March 12-13
Nassim and Paul Wilmott are offering their “infamous” two-day seminar “Quantitative Risk Management: In Theory and In Practice” on March 12th and 13th, in London. Here are the points that will be addressed:
To register, please visit the Wilmott Forums.
Nassim At the Jaipur Literary Festival
Nassim, introduced by Abhimanyu Radhakrishnan, gives a talk called “Black Swan: The Impact of the Highly Improbable” at the Jaipur Literary Festival.
What the Black Swan Problem Is and Is Not
Nassim shares Chapter 1 of his work-in-progress, Silent Risk, which explains what the Black Swan problem is and is not. He comments that it is “still incomplete, but useful.”
From his Facebook Page.
Nassim Attempts to Uberize Publishing with Descartes Monographs
Nassim shares his latest monograph (co-authored by Raphael Douady) and introduces his new venture in publishing at the same time:
Descartes Monographs accept only manuscripts that have been rigorously peer-
reviewed or contain material that has appeared in peer-reviewed journals or has
been sufficiently cited to merit inclusion in the series. Its aim is to “Überize”
academic publishing by cutting the middleperson and producing books of the
highest scientific quality at the most affordable price. Descartes engages in ethical
publishing, avoiding double-charging the public sector for books produced on
university time.
From his Facebook Page.
Nassim Has War of Words With NYTimes Journo Over GMOs
Nassim recently got into a battle on Twitter with Josh Barro, a journalist for The New York Times, after Barro took aim at people who “think GMOs are bad.” Business Insider has screenshots of the action.